<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nexus 7000 Virtual Portchannel Part 3 (final)</title>
	<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/04/30/nexus-7000-virtual-portchannel-part-3-final/</link>
	<description>Everything under the Cisco sun</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 03:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: chris stand</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/04/30/nexus-7000-virtual-portchannel-part-3-final/#comment-6244</link>
		<author>chris stand</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/04/30/nexus-7000-virtual-portchannel-part-3-final/#comment-6244</guid>
		<description>oops, my email is cstand141@gmail.com
sorry,  bad typing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, my email is <a href="mailto:cstand141@gmail.com">cstand141@gmail.com</a><br />
sorry,  bad typing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris stand</title>
		<link>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/04/30/nexus-7000-virtual-portchannel-part-3-final/#comment-6243</link>
		<author>chris stand</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://shouldhavegonewithcisco.com/2009/04/30/nexus-7000-virtual-portchannel-part-3-final/#comment-6243</guid>
		<description>I know one of the benefits of VPC is that there is a "virtual" port channel and if I were to hook up 3750E clusters to 7K w/vpc or 5010 w/vpc I would see one virtual switch connected to one virtual switch with one virtual link - great. How would this effectively be different from using GLBP to do multiple outbound path routing on two 6513s ? If I have 2 6513s cross-connected to 4 x 3750E stacks with a dozen servers connected to each 3750E stack ( the 3750Es are doing Layer 2, not L3 - its an IBM requirement ) with the servers having a GLBP provided default gateway on the 6513 vlans - would I not get essentially the same thing ? I ask because having looked at port channel interface counters between port channel connected 3750E clusters before I don't always see 1:1 counters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know one of the benefits of VPC is that there is a &#8220;virtual&#8221; port channel and if I were to hook up 3750E clusters to 7K w/vpc or 5010 w/vpc I would see one virtual switch connected to one virtual switch with one virtual link - great. How would this effectively be different from using GLBP to do multiple outbound path routing on two 6513s ? If I have 2 6513s cross-connected to 4 x 3750E stacks with a dozen servers connected to each 3750E stack ( the 3750Es are doing Layer 2, not L3 - its an IBM requirement ) with the servers having a GLBP provided default gateway on the 6513 vlans - would I not get essentially the same thing ? I ask because having looked at port channel interface counters between port channel connected 3750E clusters before I don&#8217;t always see 1:1 counters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

